Let's look at the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard.Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.The rental type gets the benefit of having a server on idc, so that it does not have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.However, you must pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not only a Webhard, it is a company.It is because it really is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data.Link hard solutions have emerged good intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the answer alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.If you already had a website or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work which used to run the site.OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage and also the Webhard's original function, the idea of creating a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the solution.The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, that can be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts which have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.It is now necessary for Soho to determine a web hard system.Rental vs. Construction.Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Online sites that allows you to download files online at a set monthly cost. Which means that the use of web hard has become common. But it's not just lately that this concept came out, and it's true that it is been a long time. The moment it came out, lots of people used it, and there have been many office workers who didn't join it or even covered their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now. The biggest background of the phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses based on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided against the backdrop of a large portal, which also leads to security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company won't adopt it.In some cases, additionally, there are many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), that is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included. NAS supplies a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative because it supports uploading files automagically. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside without having to buy an authorized IP. Unfortunately, there are functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Subsequently, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it is a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll take a look at the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the right one according to the reality and needs.
