Let's look at the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard.Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to something that shares idc's server resources with other users.Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.The rental type has the advantage of having a server on idc, so it does not have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.However, you will need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard isn't just a Webhard, it is a company.It is because it really is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.Link hard solutions have emerged in line with the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the perfect solution is alone allows users to build Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.If you already had a website or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.OK to set up installed blogs or bulletin boards.By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage along with the Webhard's original function, the idea of developing a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the solution.The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, which is often fully built in Soho, so the parts that have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.It is now essential for Soho to determine a web hard system.Rental vs. Construction.Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Online sites that allows you to download files over the Internet at a set monthly cost. This means that the application of web hard is becoming common. But it's not just lately that this concept arrived, and it's true that it's been a long time. When it came out, lots of people used it, and there were many workers in offices who didn't sign up for it or even covered their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now. The biggest background of this phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a large portal, which also leads to security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company won't adopt it.In some cases, additionally, there are many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), which is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included. NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is very innovative because it supports uploading files by default. It's a really good feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside without having to buy an authorized IP. Unfortunately, there are functional limitations because the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Due to this fact, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it's a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very useful solution that's significantly less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll have a look at the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the right one based on the reality and needs.
